Оттуда же, с лайтфайтера, с той же темы, что я сегодня публиковал.
PMAG's:
I work with a reduced combat load of 4 x PMAG's loaded to 28 rounds per. I only shoot at what I can see and know I can hit. My watchword was surgical precision. Let's say it takes seven bullets for me to bring someone down. That is 4 tango's down per magazine for a grand total of 16. Only one element around here supposedly went up against 16 hard pipeswingers, and I strongly believe that number was greatly exaggerated – plus I know I'm not going to be the only one putting in work to kill motherfuckers. I had 3 x loaded with M855A1 (I ran out of MK 262 MOD 1 early on) and one loaded with M995 due to a specific threat in my AO and having needed to engage armored threats previously. No, I will not go into details on an open forum.
PMAG's:
I work with a reduced combat load of 4 x PMAG's loaded to 28 rounds per. I only shoot at what I can see and know I can hit. My watchword was surgical precision. Let's say it takes seven bullets for me to bring someone down. That is 4 tango's down per magazine for a grand total of 16. Only one element around here supposedly went up against 16 hard pipeswingers, and I strongly believe that number was greatly exaggerated – plus I know I'm not going to be the only one putting in work to kill motherfuckers. I had 3 x loaded with M855A1 (I ran out of MK 262 MOD 1 early on) and one loaded with M995 due to a specific threat in my AO and having needed to engage armored threats previously. No, I will not go into details on an open forum.
no subject
Date: 2013-08-26 12:22 pm (UTC)Armored threats? О_о
no subject
Date: 2013-08-26 12:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-08-26 12:42 pm (UTC)Нет доверия таким пижонам. Сейчас он на "suppressive fire" забивает, на что потом забьёт?
no subject
Date: 2013-08-26 12:45 pm (UTC)во-вторых, я уже не в первый раз такое вижу. в книжке оуэна такое есть, например.
no subject
Date: 2013-08-26 12:54 pm (UTC)Я это так вижу: действуешь в составе подразделения, засунь свои закидоны в задницу - все должны быть "на одной странице", чтобы не было непонятной хурмы. Тащем-та, если это спецназеры, у которых вот это взято за правило - то ок, вопросов нет.
no subject
Date: 2013-08-26 01:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-08-26 02:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-08-26 06:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-08-27 06:44 am (UTC)ну да, видимо, совсем спокойно у них там, если он себе такое позволяет....